preloader
preloader
  • Home >
  • Would
  • Would you kill one person to save the lives of five others?
  • Post:Stuart Morrison
  • 4/20/2022
  • Read 208
  • Share:

Would you kill one person to save the lives of five others?

Looking for an answer to the question: Would you kill one person to save the lives of five others? On this page, we have gathered for you the most accurate and comprehensive information that will fully answer the question: Would you kill one person to save the lives of five others?

Is killing ethical?

Traditional medical ethics embraces the norm that doctors (and other healthcare professionals) must not kill their patients. This norm is often seen as absolute and universal. In contrast, we have argued that killing by itself is not morally wrong, although it is still morally wrong to cause total disability.


Is sacrifice important in life?

The more we sacrifice (genuinely sacrifice; not just begrudgingly do things) for another, the more we will love that person. ... He or she becomes dearer to us precisely because we have given so much of ourselves for that person. Thus sacrifice becomes a cause of love as well as an effect of it.


Why do we need to sacrifice?

Sacrifice is often about prioritization and discipline, since we don't always have the space or time in our lives to accommodate all the things we would like. ... Even when you do have aspirations, right action is required if you are to manifest the things you really want in life.


What does the trolley dilemma try to demonstrate?

The trolley dilemma and its variations demonstrate that most people approve of some actions that cause harm, yet other actions with the same outcome are not considered permissible.


Why should we sacrifice for others?

In order to achieve what we really want in life, we have to make sacrifices. Small deeds such as being kind and polite to others, helping the needy, and spending money for the poor children's education, etc. are some of the noble deeds that one can do daily. ... Without pain, without sacrifice we would have nothing.


Why do I sacrifice myself for others?

Self-sacrificing is a sign of fear People who always self-sacrifice are likely to be people-pleasers who live in terror that not doing what someone else wants will result in the other person not liking them or getting angry.


Would a utilitarian sacrifice one person to save a few?

The utilitarian perspective dictates that most appropriate action is the one that achieves the greatest good for the greatest number. ... Psychological research shows that in the first version of the problem, most people agree with utilitarians, deeming it morally acceptable to flip the switch, killing one to save five.


How can sacrifice be a good thing?

It's normal to feel that way. However, when we sacrifice what we want right now, we are saving our time and energy for something more important. Something that will bring us one step closer to our real goals. Something we truly want, not just something we want right now.


Would you push the fat man off the bridge?

However, a fat man, a stranger, is standing next to you: if you push him off the bridge, he will topple onto the line and, although he will die, his chunky body will stop the train, saving five lives.


Is sacrificing one life to save the lives of many?

Sacrificing one life to save others -- research shows psychopaths' force for 'greater good' New research shows that people would sacrifice one person to save a larger group of people - and in addition, the force with which they carry out these actions could be predicted by psychopathic traits.

Would you kill one person to save the lives of five others? Video Answer

Kill 1 to Save 5? Consequentialism vs. Deontology

Would you kill one person to save the lives of five others? Expert Answers

Answeregy Expert
Charles ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Moral dilemma: Would you kill one person to save five ...

Nine out of 10 people would kill one person to save five others, according to a provocative new morality study led by Carlos David Navarrete, assistant professor of psychology.

Answeregy Expert
Easton ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Would You Kill One Person to Save Five? - ThoughtCo

From a simple utilitarian point of view, the dilemma is the same — do you sacrifice one life to save five? — and the answer is the same: yes. Interestingly, however, many people who would pull the lever in the first scenario would not push the man in this second scenario.

Answeregy Expert
Carole ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Most People Would Kill 1 Person to Save 5 Others | Live ...

Most People Would Kill 1 Person to Save 5 Others Study participants donned a head-mounted device that presented them with a 3-D simulated version of the boxcar scenario. (Image credit: Michigan...

Answeregy Expert
Justene ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Would you kill one person to save five others?

In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, pulling the lever does not inflict direct harm on the...

Answeregy Expert
Thomas ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Could you kill one person if it would save the lives of ...

In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, pulling the lever does not inflict direct harm on the...

Answeregy Expert
Daryl ⭐ Answeregy Expert

The trolley problem: would you kill one person to save ...

Psychological research shows that in the first version of the problem, most people agree with utilitarians, deeming it morally acceptable to flip the switch, killing one to save five. But in the...

Answeregy Expert
Yutaka ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Would you sacrifice one person to save the lives of many ...

Consequentialist morality states that it is better to act in a way that will benefit the most number of people even if it means causing harm – so killing one person to save five.

Answeregy Expert
Miranda ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Would you kill one person to save five? - Quora

In both versions of the trolley problem above, utilitarians say you should sacrifice one to save five, while deontologists say you should not. Psychological r esearch shows that in the first version of the problem, most people agree with utilitarians, deeming it morally acceptable to …

Answeregy Expert
Ivana ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Is it morally right to kill one person in order to save 5 ...

The killing of one person to save five is not morally just because that would require the decision maker to view human life as a quantitative value. Humans however possess individual qualities so then that one person that might be killed for five might be someone like Einstein. While the other five might be ill educated drug addicts.

Answeregy Expert
Agnes ⭐ Answeregy Expert

The trolley dilemma—would you kill one person to save five ...

You would still be indirectly responsible for the death of five people. If you choose to actively save the one person on the tracks, you are now still responsible for the death of five people. If you decide to pull the switch, the one person on the tracks will certainly die, but the lives on the trolley are now saved.

Answeregy Expert
Philip ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Would You Kill One Person to Save Five? New Research on a ...

Navarette and his team found that, once again, 90% of us would kill the one to save the five. Among the 147 participants, 133 pulled the switch. Interestingly, those who were more emotionally...

Answeregy Expert
Oracio ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Would you kill one person to save five? Depends if you’re ...

In the third, “footbridge” scenario you can stop the train killing the five workers only by pushing a man off a bridge above the track into the train’s path, bringing it to a halt. In each...

Answeregy Expert
Melvin ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Would You Kill One Person To Save Five? - Veterans Today ...

The majority may lament the deaths of the five innocents, but they cannot bring themselves to bring about the death of a loved one in order to save the lives of strangers. That is most understandable from a psychological point of view. Humans are primed both in the course of evolution and through their upbringing to care most for those around them.

Answeregy Expert
Gianna ⭐ Answeregy Expert

The trolley problem: would you kill one person to save ...

> The trolley problem: would you kill one person to save many others? APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February …

Answeregy Expert
Sadie ⭐ Answeregy Expert

The Trolley Problem | Life Long Learning

In this case, if you were flipping the switch that would kill one person to save five others, then the sixth man had been used solely as a means of savings others, with no consideration for his right to not have his very life taken. St. Thomas Aquinas:

Answeregy Expert
Louella ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Justice | Michael J. Sandel - Harvard University

Would you kill one person to save the lives of five others? Would it be the right thing to do? Inviting students to respond to some amusing hypothetical scenarios, Professor Michael Sandel launches his course on moral reasoning. Lecture 2 – The Case for Cannibalism

Answeregy Expert
Ruth ⭐ Answeregy Expert

The trolley dilemma: would you kill one person to save five?

In the first trolley dilemma, the person who pulls the lever is saving the life of the five workers and letting the one person die. After all, pulling the lever does not inflict direct harm on the...

Answeregy Expert
Norma ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Moral dilemma: Would you kill one person to save five ...

Nine out of 10 people would kill one person to save five others, according to a provocative new morality study. Share: FULL STORY Imagine a runaway boxcar heading toward five people who can't...

Answeregy Expert
Elliot ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Who would sacrifice one person in order to save five ...

Unlike the first scenario, the death of one individual is not only taken into account, but is necessary in order to save the lives of the other five. In the third scenario, one large man can be knocked off a pedestrian bridge onto the tracks, as a result of which his body stops the …

Answeregy Expert
Paula ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Would you kill one person to save a thousand?

The person you love, more than anyone else in the world, is about to die. The only way you can save them, is by taking someone else's life. Could you bring yourself to do it? Would you take a life to save the life of the one you love most dearly?

Answeregy Expert
Harvey ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Would you sacrifice one person to save five? - TED

Imagine you're watching a runaway trolley barreling down the tracks, straight towards five workers. You happen to be standing next to a switch that will divert the trolley onto a second track. Here's the problem: that track has a worker on it, too — but just one. What do you do? Do you sacrifice one person to save five? Eleanor Nelsen details the ethical dilemma that is the trolley problem.

Answeregy Expert
Donna ⭐ Answeregy Expert

The Moral Side of Murder.docx - SAVELLANO Laureen T BSA-2C ...

SAVELLANO, Laureen T. BSA-2C 1. The Moral Side of Murder Would you kill one person to save the lives of five others? Would it be the right thing to do? Explain your point. Certain individuals argued that certain actions are morally unjustifiable regardless of the outcome, even if they result in the death of an innocent person to save five lives. However, if I were to ask, the right and moral ...

Answeregy Expert
Johnpaul ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Is it okay to sacrifice one person to save many? How you ...

On the side track, it will kill one worker whose body will stop the trolley before it can kill the five on the main track. In the Footbridge version, a large man can be pushed in front of the trolley.

Answeregy Expert
Louie ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Killing 1 Person to Save 5 - Scientific American

Would you kill one person to save five others? Philosophers have posed this moral dilemma for decades. Typically they present the situation as a mental exercise. A runaway train is about to strike ...

Answeregy Expert
Adrienne ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Trolley dilemma: When it's acceptable to sacrifice one ...

Overall, 81 percent were willing to switch the carriage to a separate train track to kill one person instead of five, and half would throw a man off a footbridge on to the tracks to spare five.

Answeregy Expert
Gloria ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Assignment #5 | Global Ethics | Fall 2013

I think in that moment it would make more sense to lose one life in order to save five. 2. In the instance of the observer on the overpass I would contradict my opinion in the first scenario and not kill the one to save the five. I think it is a completely different situation …

Answeregy Expert
Boyd ⭐ Answeregy Expert

The Trolley Problem

bridge, so that he dies, but the five others are saved. Strangely, 90% of people say that you SHOULD kill the one in Switch (by pulling the lever), while 95% of people say that you SHOULD NOT kill the one in Footbridge— though the results are the same. In each case, the option is to kill 1, or let 5 die. What

Answeregy Expert
Craig ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Is killing one man in order to save 10 wrong? | Debate.org

In no way is that wrong. If one man is to be killed to save the lives of others, then that is perfectly fine. Think of all the school shootings, if someone had the chance, to kill the child that committed that deed, to save their own children, I believe many would do so.

Answeregy Expert
Marcy ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Would you kill someone to save one hundred people ...

13 years ago Side: Yes. Support Dispute Clarify. breid909 (17) 5 points. Unless the one person was of great importance, it would be logical to save the hundred people. By not killing the one person, you are indirectly killing the hundred by negligence. That, however, is a general answer to a general question.

Answeregy Expert
Trevor ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Top 10 Reasons why a Person kills Someone - List Dose

If a person is drunk, then a single statement can make you dead. 3. Revenge: Revenge is a very strong feeling that can even make non-criminals kill others. If someone did wrong to you, then revenge is the feeling that where you want the other person to experience the …

Answeregy Expert
Kimberly ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Moral Theory of Deontology Explained With Varied Examples ...

Before you are to redirect the train, you see that there is one man tied to this adjoining track too. So, you have to either change the track, kill one person, and save the five innocent lives, or let all the five die. What number would you choose to save, and would it be a decision of numbers at all?

Answeregy Expert
Hans ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Moral dilemma: Would you kill 1 person to save 5?

Imagine a runaway boxcar heading toward five people who can't escape its path. Now imagine you had the power to reroute the boxcar onto different tracks with only one person along that route.

Answeregy Expert
Ari ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Trolley problem - Wikipedia

The trolley problem is a series of thought experiments in ethics and psychology, involving stylized ethical dilemmas of whether to sacrifice one person to save a larger number. The series usually begins with a scenario in which a runaway tram or trolley is on course to collide with and kill a number of people (traditionally five) down the track, but a driver or bystander can intervene and ...

Answeregy Expert
Nadia ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Would you sacrifice one person to save five? - Eleanor ...

View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/would-you-sacrifice-one-person-to-save-five-eleanor-nelsenImagine you’re watching a runaway trolley barreling dow...

Answeregy Expert
Efrain ⭐ Answeregy Expert

"The Trolley Problem" in Judaism - Sacrifice One Life to ...

If you flip the switch, the trolley will be redirected onto a side track, and the five people on the main track will be saved. There is, however, a single person lying on the side track, and if the trolley is diverted to there, that single person will be killed. You have two options: 1. …

Answeregy Expert
Jenifer ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Resolved: It is morally permissible to kill one innocent ...

Even if killing one innocent person were to save more people, it is not morally permissible because the action of killing is immoral in all cases. [Edit] Definitions [Edit] Morally Permissible An action that is allowed and/or considered "right" by the moral code of conduct set by the society in question.

Answeregy Expert
Valentine ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Medical ethics and the trolley Problem

In order to save the five, he would have had to kill the one person. The surgeon wisely refuses to engage in such a procedure in deference to non-maleficence. The driver of the trolley, by contrast, does have the moral obligation to kill one in order to save five, because …

Answeregy Expert
Estelle ⭐ Answeregy Expert

B6.docx - [1:05 AM \ufffd Rose \ufffd Can you give a short ...

Looking back at the original trolley problem, throwing one switch to divert a train so it would only kill one person rather than five, discuss whether you think you would throw the switch. Then consider the twist where you could push a rather large person (gender should make no difference) from a bridge to save the lives of five others.

Answeregy Expert
Cody ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Self-Quiz

She now thinks it is permissible to turn the trolley to kill the one person. b. ... a. agree that in the bystander should not kill the one to save the five. ... Thomson thinks most would not sacrifice their own lives to save five others. a. True b. False.

Answeregy Expert
Chana ⭐ Answeregy Expert

ethics - Would Kant choose to sacrifice one life to save ...

One could argue that the duty, i.e. moral obligation, is to save at least one life and the choice which one is not a question of morals, but of ethics (narrow sense). I think your answer is a) not kantian at all and b) not sourced in Kant, which may coincide.

Answeregy Expert
Marie ⭐ Answeregy Expert

The Elements of Moral Philosophy

The Save a Life Argument. 1. We have a choice between acting to save one infant or letting both die. 2. Acting to save one has the better outcome (one lives versus neither lives) _____ Therefore, we ought to act to save the one infant. As always, we begin by asking whether the argument is valid. The argument, as stated, is not valid.

Answeregy Expert
Clarissa ⭐ Answeregy Expert

When is it ethical to kill somone? | Salon.com

So you can save five lives at the cost of one life. Almost everyone, when you ask them that question, says you should do that and kill the one person. ... of course you should kill the one person ...

Answeregy Expert
Megan ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Resolved: It is morally permissible to kill one innocent ...

When the negative argues that no one is innocent, the affirmative can agree - but note that in the context of the resolution, there are innocent people. The resolution asks a question of morality, and we must situate the question in a world in which the question could come to be.

Answeregy Expert
Bryon ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Lecture 2: The Case for Cannibalism – Harvard Justice

A brief overview of the case: Suppose you find yourself in a situation in which killing an innocent person is the only way to prevent many innocent people from dying. What’s the right thing to do? This question arose in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens (1884), a famous English law case involving four men stranded in a lifeboat without food or water.

Answeregy Expert
Josephine ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Is it okay to harvest pig kidneys for human transplant? - Vox

Five of his patients need new parts — one needs a heart, the others need, respectively, liver, stomach, spleen, and spinal cord — but all are of the same, relatively rare, blood-type.

Answeregy Expert
Clementine ⭐ Answeregy Expert

‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do ...

2.1.2.1. Moral dilemmas . Four sacrificial dilemmas involving ‘up-close-and personal’ harm were presented in random order. These ‘personal’ dilemmas were drawn from Moore, Clark, and Kane (2008) and included the classic Footbridge case, in which one can save five people from a runaway trolley only by pushing another person onto the tracks, leading to their death (see Supplementary ...

Answeregy Expert
Marcela ⭐ Answeregy Expert

I could smother the child. I could not ... - MetaFilter

It is clear that, all things being equal, it is better for one person to die than for five people to die; but it's not clear that you can kill an innocent person, even to save other people's lives. When you change variables in the situation so that the proper moral description seems to be not just "I changed things so that fewer die" but "I ...

Answeregy Expert
Ty ⭐ Answeregy Expert

Autonomous Vehicle Ethics: Stock or custom? | IEEE ...

As it turns out, Thompson declares that "most people" believe it is acceptable to divert a train away from killing five people, to kill only one, but in a variation involving pushing someone onto the track to stop the trolley, most people believe that it "would not be morally permissible for …

Used Resourses:

About Author
Answeregy Author

Stuart Morrison

Hi everyone, my name is Stuart Morrison and I am the editor-in-chief and author of the Answeregy website. I am 35 years old and live in Miami, Florida. From an early age I loved to learn new things, constantly reading various encyclopedias and magazines. In 1998 I created my first Web site, where I posted interesting facts which you could rarely learn elsewhere. Then, it led me to work as a content manager for a large online publication. I always wanted to help people while doing something I really enjoyed. That's how I ended up on the answeregy.org team, where I... Read more